|
|
|
|
Test
4 Feedback
Cities
and Urbanisation
Here
is the feedback and answers to the Test
in Unit 04.
|
 |
|
| 1 |
(a) |
(i)
|
This
is a Foundation Tier question. It is quite straightforward, but think
it through very carefully. Read the question properly. The answer
is Mexico City.
|
| |
|
(ii) |
Another
foundation question. As with part (i), you need to read the
question carefully and make sure you choose exactly the right information
from the table. The answer to this is Sao Paulo.
|
| |
|
(iii) |
The
first two questions were quite straightforward. All you had to do
was select the right information. To do this, you have to learn
to recognise patterns in the information presented to you. It may
help you to highlight all the information that relates to LEDC cities.
It should then be easier to see that the five LEDC cities have high
growth rates (1.3% or more) and the three MEDC cities have low growth
rates (0.5 or less).
|
| |
|
(iv) |
You
must memorise a clear, precise definition of this word. If you didn't
write something very like the definition given below, then you must
do some more learning! Try saying the definition out loud to yourself
to help you remember it.
Urbanisation
is an increase in the proportion of the country's population living
in cities.
|
|
| |
(b) |
Here
is another example where precise learning is needed. If you don't
give the name of a settlement that you have studied, you will not
gain the mark available in part (i). If in part (ii)
you then write a general description of Any Old Place you will not
gain a high level mark. Here is an example of a good answer:
La
Esperanza in Colombia is a squatter settlement that was very carefully
planned. Each family which took part in the invasion of the land
got its own plot to build a house on. The buildings were made of
wood and corrugated iron at first, but then people bought bricks
and made blocks to improve their houses. At first there was no electricity,
but residents made illegal connections to the mains. Many families
built cesspits for their toilets, and the council agreed to have
them emptied every few months, to stop disease spreading.
|
| |
|
(ii) |
You
should try to break down your answer to give it a clear structure.
Here is a good way you could begin:
Housing conditions can be improved either
by the people themselves, or by the city authorities .
If
you structure your answer like this, you can write about two separate
types of scheme and gain good marks for both parts. If your answer
does not have a structure, with just a string of points, you will
probably not get such a high mark.
Your answer could continue like this:
People
can gradually make their house stronger as they save money to buy
better materials. Many make illegal connections to the electricity
system as a first stage, and then try to get this legalised later.
City authorities are often too poor to build many new houses, but
they do set up 'site and service' schemes where they provide land
and connections to services like water and sewers, and then let
people build their own houses to a simple design.
|
|
(c)
|
(i) |
Read
the newspaper article first, to get a general idea of what it is
about.Then read the question.
Then go back and search through the extract for two relevant
pieces of information. You would get probably marks for:
green fields
clean air
lower crime rates
You
may want to develop each answer a little more, especially if you
are entered for the Higher Tier. Then you might write:
green fields provide
space to play
clean air, free from traffic
pollution
lower crime rates because the
crowded inner city produces a lot of petty vandalism and burglary
|
|
(ii) |
Suggested
problems could be:
loss of farmland
loss of wild life habitat
more traffic using the roads
back into the city at rush hours
villages are overwhelmed by
newcomers
more people need more shops,
more roads, more jobs, so the rural-urban fringe gets crowded
Remember
that you must write about an example in your answer. Name
the city you are writing about, then name the particular area where
development is taking place. If you write about congestion on the
roads, name actual roads. If you write about out-of-town
shopping developments, name a real shopping centre, and so
on.
|
|
(iii) |
The
same rules apply here. You could write about the work of an Urban
Development Corporation (such as London Docklands); or you could write
about a Housing Association, or about a local council improvement
scheme; or about the improvements caused by 'gentrification' when
wealthy people move into run down areas, and spend money on improving
the houses so that the area becomes more attractive. But do write
about a real place; examiners get annoyed when Geography candidates
write about the geography of Nowhere-in-Particular! |
|
|